The Art of Rice
© by
Maciej Tomczak, December 2004
The surreally gargantuan rice terraces near
Chinese town of Yuanyang,Yunnan are easy to miss.
Surprisingly, guidebooks hardly mention the
place. And when they do, it seems to be out of the need
for completeness. The site is scantly promoted
internationally – a far cry from the fame of Ifugao terraces
near Banaue in Philippines, the Hmong structures around Sapa in
northern Vietnam or the terraces of Bali, Indonesia. Most
package tours miss it too. The spot is still mercifully
below the China National Tourism Administration’s radar, though
given the Administration’s growing appetite for the new,
picturesque mass retreats appealing to China’s well-heeled
east-coasters, the Yuanyang’s obscurity may not last for long.
Yuanyang is quiet, but vulgar and
uninspiring. The discovery of the town’s fondness for
canine cuisine may easily become its only discerning feature in
a westerner’s travel blog. Coming here requires a lengthy,
premeditated detour, west from the standard backpackers trail
passing from Hekou – a China/Vietnam border-crossing, to Kunming,
Dali or Lijang – towns where travellers congregate. One
quickly looses any reservations about going the extra mile to get
here though: collectively, the nearby rice terraces, curved in
the Ailao Mountains by generations of Hani farmers must be among
the most spectacular landscapes on the Planet!
Within a short hike or a public bus ride in
virtually any direction from Yuanyang, there are over 100 square
kilometres of intricately irrigated terraced fields of
cultivated wet rice. At elevations of almost 2,000 meters,
millions of ‘groovy trays’ pepper the steep hills, some built on
slopes approaching 70-degree gradient. At places, there
may be 2,000-3,000 ‘stacked pans’ sculpted on a single slope.
The ‘Steps to Heaven’ were built by
Hani settlers (now-sedentary Agha relatives) who have migrated
to today’s Yunnan from Qinghai-Tibetan plateau in the 7th
century. Originally nomadic, Hani were progressively
pushed out and up from fertile valleys of the Red (Honghe) River
by Han Chinese expansions. Some two centuries ago, they
settled in the highlands and began farming steep hillsides of
Ailao Mountains, which are now home to most of some 1,250,000
Hani living in China.
In contrast to the lowlands, which enjoy up
to three rice harvests a year, there is only a single yield in
the mountains. Hani families plant rice seedlings by hand
around May, and harvest them in the fall. There is no bad
season for photography here: the stupendous displays of light
reflections in the winter and the spring, when the terraces are
full of water, alternate with stunning emerald vistas during the
rice growing season.
Remarkably, the terraces are irrigated by a
sustainable hydrologic cycle. Water, evaporated from the
warm lowland river valleys, condenses as fog and low clouds,
which move up the hills and coalesce in the foliage of the
hilltop forests above the terraces. Collected water feeds the
intricate network of channels and, cascading downhill the
terrace sequences via weirs, makes its way back towards the Red
River. The forests, acting as water traps and temporary
reservoirs, are sacred and strictly protected by the villages.
Most of the field-tending and irrigation
upkeep is done by hand or with the help of, magically nimble for
their size and clunky looks, water buffalos. Buffalos’
dang is collected in the manure ponds in villages and, during
the summer monsoons, mixed with irrigation water right on time
to fertilize growing rice paddies.
The tightly-knitted Hani society, fuelled by
its efficient self governance and harmonious environmental
theology, have not changed much for centuries and continues to
function well today. The functional rice terraces, a
communal creation on a grand scale supporting over a million
souls, are the testament of the wisdom of such order.
But not all is rosy in the Ailao Mountains.
Although Chinese authorities recognised Hani as a ‘nationality’
and continue to paint the felicitous, if nostalgic, picture of
this and other minorities, the southeast Yunnan remains among
the poorest regions in the country. China’s burgeoning
economy only widened traditional income gap between
well-educated urban elites of Han Chinese and rural indigenous
populations – the latter consistently near the bottom of the
social and economic ladder. This leaves Hani increasingly
vulnerable and the future of their traditional way of life and
rice cultivation all but assured.
Equally alarming are the reports on China
contemplating mass-scale introduction of commercialized
varieties of genetically modified (GM) rice as early as in 2005.
Even if the globally controversial consumption-safety and
economic issues of GM rice are ignored, such decision may
disfranchise Hani farmers (all GM rice is hybrid, so Hani will
have to buy new GM seeds every year) and will threaten the
present mind-boggling biodiversity of rice in China – estimated
at some 75,000 of distinct rice species, many of them grown in
Yunnan.
Recording these spectacular vistas is not
difficult. The best light for photography is, not
surprisingly, at dawn and at sunset. But the best
locations for either of the two vary: asking the locals and
scouting locations during the day will help. If the water
reflections are what you are after, find the valleys looking
towards the sun. If you feel that the low sun will ignite
the far slopes with a worthwhile illumination, go to the other
side. Both are easy to find, but since distances are
considerable, time-coordinated planning makes sense if you hike
or hitchhike. It is worth remembering that the valleys are
quite deep and are often curtailed by dark shadows when the sun
is low. The morning fog coverage changes quickly. It
moves in and out the valleys, rendering them from visually
amazing to photographically mediocre by the minute.
There are two typical exposure situations
that I encountered, which may prove challenging. The first
is a contrasty scene with highlights made up by specular
reflections of strong sun or bright sky off the water surfaces
and deep shadows elsewhere. My technique is to spot-meter
the brightest area, and compensate the reading by +2 to +2.5
stops. Since most slide films and digital sensors have a
dynamic range of some 5 stops, such exposure will make the very
bright areas look indeed very bright when recorded, but without
the dreaded ‘burning’ of the highlights. For this
technique to work, the rest of the scene details must fall
within the 5 stops from the highlights brightness; anything
lower than that will record as pure, featureless black.
For very contrasty scenes with dynamic range
exceeding 5 exposure stops one could either try to deliberately
overexpose water reflections (this tends to work only for small,
scattered sparkles or ‘speculars’ that do not take much of the
picture space) or let the shadows go black as a deliberate
artistic choice. Another, more exotic method of dealing
with very high contrast is to extend the intrinsically limited
dynamic range of film or digital sensor by combining parts of
two separate exposures of the same scene in the darkroom
(digital or otherwise): the properly exposed highlights from the
underexposed slide with the properly exposed shadows from the
overexposed slide.
The other situations with somewhat tricky
exposure are scenes with fog and clouds. Fog is brighter
than the middle grey of the camera exposure meters, but not
quite featureless white – there are objects shrouded by fog that
we want to photograph not the fog itself. Uncritically
following the metered exposure will render the misty scenes too
dark, with muddy details and the shadows likely descending to
solid black. I typically dial +1.5 to +2 stops
compensation from what metering on clouds would indicate and +1
to +1.5 stops for the scenes shrouded in fog, to render them in
desired tonalities and preserve their texture and details.
Tonality of other scenes may look
straightforward to the eye, but can fool both the camera and the
photographer. Humans have a sliding-scale, adaptive vision
that can accommodate more than 10 stops of brightness range in a
single scene. Recognizing the narrower range of tonalities
that camera records and placing those tonalities in the desired
brightness ranges on film takes thought and practice. A
simple field technique to check our senses and exposure meters
is to compare the scene tones with the brightness of the palm of
a hand and, if both are illuminated similarly, exposing
accordingly. Most palms are about +1 stop lighter than the
medium grey – the tone that the camera light meters will insist
on when advising the exposure.
Travel photography is, no doubt, satisfying.
Things look different when you are on the road and photography
can add another level of meaning to vagabonding. The
downside is all that gear to ‘schlep’ for months. It
invariably weighs more than it looks and, instead of boosting an
adventurer’s ego, makes one feel like a terminally geeky
tourist.
If you travel independently, there is one
rule to follow when choosing travel gear (and this is a serious
advice): bring less. A setup consisting of one light SLR
body, 2-3 light lenses plus film is capable of covering a lot of
ground and will already weigh enough to make you curse
photography at times. If batteries, cables, chargers and
backups are added up, things will not weigh any less in the
serious digital realm, and all the gadgets running on power and
batteries will likely be more awkward and less reliable than
film when taken ‘off road’. If in doubt, use the gear that
you already own – anything new is likely to make only
incremental improvements to your photography, if at all.
On the bright side, travel photography is by
definition situational: you never know what is going to happen
next and you have no option other than coping with what comes.
This is precisely why it makes it such an exciting calling.
Light backpack will make you more mobile and adaptable.
And remember that often, quite a few plane and bus tickets can
be bought for the price of another extraneous piece of gear.
Unfortunately, repeating this mantra while away is more
effective than sticking to it before leaving home…
For the work shown here I used Canon Elan7e –
a very capable 35mm body but still quite light thanks to the
lack of heavy duty shielding and sealing found in the
‘professional’ SLRs. Canon’s 28-135/f3.5-5.6 IS USM lens
is most useful, lovely and still (barely) within my financial
reach. The other two lenses that I carry are 75-300/f4-5.6
IS USM – a so-so compromise between price, quality, usability
and weight, and a straight 50/f1.8 for good measure – it’s
light, fast, cheap and sharp. I miss a truly wide-angle
lens sometimes, but see the mantra above…
I recently started traveling without a
serious tripod – a risky proposition that would make a purist
cringe. But what one would not do in the name of mobility!
In many cases it is quite easy to improvise camera support using
a beanbag, a hanging nylon cord, a table top tripod, a motorbike
seat or a folded toque. Such makeshift solutions will not
always work, but I found that with careful technique, IS and
some luck, sharp slides result, many of which would unlikely
even exist if a ‘fully-grown’ tripod was involved.
All the photographs in this article were
taken using 35mm slide film. The film was scanned to 48
bit TIFF files by a 5400dpi slide scanner using 4x resampling to
reduce digital noise. The image tonalities were adjusted
using Picture Window Pro – a superb, fully-featured, 16bit
digital darkroom application, worthy much wider recognition.
My workflow is colour-managed, though some colour compensation
in Picture Window Pro is sometimes necessary to make prints look
decent. As a part of the workflow, digital scanning noise
and film grain were reduced with Neat Image – another amazing
piece of software, which, if used sparingly and thoughtfully,
allows for printing surprisingly big enlargements from 35mm
frames. ₪
(This essay
was published in
the
March 2006 issue of the
PhotoLife Magazine
(Vol31_N2);
Editor's selection of text and photographs differed from mine)